5-Integrating High-Value Care Communication into Teaching Rounds

MODULE 7 | Section 5 of 10

Integrating High-Value Care Communication into Teaching Rounds

Teaching rounds is a critical learning experience for most health care professionals, yet trainees perceive that high-value care principles are rarely role-modeled.1-3 In fact, students report that the overuse of medical tests at the bedside undermined the high-value care concepts that they were taught in more formal settings.2 The flipside of that is that when attending physicians do teach about high-value care practice in the clinical setting it is more strongly correlated with resident-reported high-value care behaviors compared to formal curricula.4

 

A team from Seattle Children’s Hospital have developed and tested a “High-Value Care Rounding Tool” to measure the content and frequency of high-value care discussions during rounds.5,6 This tool can serve as a valuable guide, as well as a source for feedback, to ingrain these discussions into rounds.

M7s5p2

THE HVC ROUNDING TOOL TOPICS BY DOMAIN

The following lists components of the high-value care rounding tool. See article in source for data on how frequently they observed these conversations during multidisciplinary bedside rounds for 660 patient encounters at Seattle Children’s Hospital.

QUALITY TOPICS DISCUSSED DURING ROUNDS

  • Offer anticipatory guidance to prevent a complication of a medical issue or unplanned readmission

  • Narrow Down the chronic and/or home medication list or discharge medication list

  • Praised a team member for not doing an unnecessary test and/or treatment

  • How a test may or may not “change,” “impact,” or “affect” management

  • Balance between the clinical benefits of care and its harms

COST TOPICS DISCUSSED DURING ROUNDS

  • Care alternatives, including less expensive test and/or treatment (cost) and/or observation

  • Avoid or cancel a low-value test (daily CBC; ESR and CRP),therapy or monitoring (pulse oximeter), or consult

  • Discussion about whether the patient requires ongoing hospitalization

PATIENT VALUES TOPICS DISCUSSED DURING ROUNDS

  • Customize care plan to incorporate patient and/or family in the context of a specific medical decision (also could include “goals” and “values”)

  • Discussion about what “worries” or “concerns” the patient and/or family in the context of a specific medical decision (also could include “goals” and “values”)

CBC, complete blood cell count; CRP, C-creative protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

These topics can (and should) be raised by any member of the team, not just the attending physician!

SOAP-V

Medical students and other trainees can introduce value into rounds using the “SOAP-V” model, which modifies the traditional SOAP (Subjective-Objective-Assessment-Plan) presentation to include a discussion of value (SOAP-V).7

The SOAP-V model prompts the student to consider:

  1. the evidence that supports a test or treatment,
  2. the patient’s preferences and values, and
  3. the financial cost of a test or treatment compared to alternatives.

This creates a cognitive forcing function to begin to incorporate concepts of value into daily patient care, as well as gives medical students a “managing up” role for introducing these discussions into rounds. However, remember that we must always primarily consider outcomes when making decisions about value. This SOAP-V tool has now been successfully used at multiple medical schools during internal medicine, pediatrics and other clinical rotations.

M7s5p4

Learn More

ARTICLE

The authors of this tool sought to bring a systematic measurement tool to the teaching of high value care at the bedside. Read more to learn about the effects of using this tool in practice.

McDaniel CE, White AA, Bradford MC, et al. Acad Med. 2018;93(2):199-206.

ARTICLE

This article studies the validity of the HVC rounding tool and actual use of high-value care discussions in practice.
Beck JB, McDaniel CE, Bradford MC, et al. Hosp Peds. 2018;8(3):119-126.
BLOG POST
Read more about the origins and purpose of the SOAP-V rounding tool and the results of its use in medical school.
Moser EM, Huang GC, Packer CD, et al. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(3):217-220.>

REFERENCES

  1. 1- Patel MS, Reed DA, Smith C, Arora VM. Role–modeling cost-conscious care–a national evaluation of perceptions of faculty at teaching hospitals in the United StatesJ Gen Intern Med. July 2015:1-5. doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3242-5

 

  1. 2- Leep Hunderfund AN, Dyrbye LN, Starr SR, et al. Role modeling and regional health care intensity: U.S. medical student attitudes toward and experiences with cost-conscious careAcad Med. May 2016:1.

 

  1. 3- Pierce C, Keniston A, Stickrath C. Frequency of attending physician–led discussion of test-ordering principles during teaching roundsJAMA Intern Med. December 2015:1-2. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6979

 

  1. 4-Ryskina KL, Smith CD, Weissman A, et al. U.S. internal medicine residents’ knowledge and practice of high-value care: a national surveyAcad Med. 2015;90(10):1373-1379. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000791

 

  1. 5-McDaniel CE, White AA, Bradford MC, et al. The High-Value Care Rounding Tool: development and validity evidenceAcad Med. 2018;93(2):199. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001873

 

  1. 6-Beck JB, McDaniel CE, Bradford MC, et al. Prospective observational study on high-value care topics discussed on multidisciplinary roundsHosp Pediatr. 2018;8(3):119-126. doi:10.1542/hpeds.2017-0183

 

  1. 7-Moser EM, Huang GC, Packer CD, et al. SOAP-V: introducing a method to empower medical students to be change agents in bending the cost curveJ Hosp Med. 2016;11(3):217-220. doi:10.1002/jhm.2489

Leave a Comment